No Choice but Welcoming Refugees: The Non-Refoulement Principle as Customary International Law in Indonesia

نویسندگان

چکیده

The non-refoulement principle requires each country to consider refugees and asylum seekers in their of origin if they are subject persecution threaten lives. As a geographically strategic country, Indonesia has been significant crossroad for international often temporary destination. Moreover, the complex situation encouraged reinterpret into various national measures domestic policies, given that is deemed transit not ratified 1951 Convention on Status Refugees. This paper aims analyse concept refugee protection under law, particularly investigate application Indonesia. study employed normative empirical legal research with statutory, conceptual, comparative approaches. confirms part jus cogens norms law but does fit its application. inconsistency upholding binding rules. Refugees have received far less attention from Indonesian government due insufficient infrastructure financial allocation. existing executive regulations do provide effective enforcement since these lower position hierarchy cannot deterrent sanctions. Hence, ratification urgently needed by guarantee within jurisdiction. At regional scope, can encourage ASEAN countries adopt good practices European Union set sharing quotas ensure most escape

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A State Preferences Account of Customary International Law Adjudication

The standard account today of customary international law (CIL) is that it arises from the widespread and consistent practice of states followed out of a sense of legal obligation. Although commonly recited, this account is plagued by evidentiary, normative, and conceptual difficulties, and it has been subjected to increasing criticism in recent years. This paper posits a different account of C...

متن کامل

the principle of res judicata in international law

the legal system of any given society, whether national or international, requires that legal disputes between the parties must be finally concluded and settled. abiding by judgments made by international courts and prevention of contradictory judgments are related to international public order. variety of international courts, arbitration tribunals and commissions increases the possibility of ...

متن کامل

The Law of Non-Contradiction as aMetaphysical Principle

The goals of this paper are two-fold: I wish to clarify the Aristotelian conception of the law of non-contradiction as a metaphysical rather than a semantic or logical principle, and to defend the truth of the principle in this sense. First I will explain what it in fact means that the law of non-contradiction is a metaphysical principle. The core idea is that the law of non-contradiction is a ...

متن کامل

Fundamental Principles Regarding the Guarantee of the Principle of Judicial Impartiality in the International System and the Law of Iranian Law

The principles of independence and impartiality of the Judiciary is one of the most important grounds to achieve a fair trial and to ensure the rights of citizens in the proceedings, the principles which are inevitable for the existence of a judiciary whit fair and equitable judges. These principles have recognized in the vast majority of domestic legal systems as well as international legal re...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Lentera Hukum

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['2355-4673', '2621-3710']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v10i1.37920